Iron Chef America - Battle Apple?
09/17/2007Iron Chef America Battle Apple. I would say something about the content of the show, but I’m still - uhh - not quite sure what to write about this battle.
Chef Mark Tarbell hails from Arizona, and entered kitchen stadium, choosing to battle Iron Chef Cat Cora. The chairman chose Apples as the secret ingredient. I think Alton Brown mentioned that there were at least four different varieties of apple available. The Judges? The regulars Jeffrey Steingarten and Karine Bakhoum, along with a judge I’ve never seen, Bone Crusher. Seriously, The guy’s name is actually Bone Crusher - how could he be an Iron Chef America judge? I want to be an Iron Chef America judge! I’m sure I’d be able to give a more eloquent and communicative impression of the food I would be served on the show.
The battle was a very poor battle to try to follow last week’s Battle Parmigiano Reggiano - it wasn’t nearly as good - lacked excitement, wasn’t as entertaining and the ingredient was very common, yet viewers had to think about what you would even be able to make with apples - aside from pie. Even with the challenge, I thought the chefs did pull off some creative dishes. I liked Tarbell’s Dessert, a trio of small apple orbs - one coated in caramel/toffee, one coated in chocolate, and one coated in the classic red candy that’s at the hard crack stage. Cora also presented a caramel apple, but used very small apples, which I’m sure were much harder to eat. the judges didn’t seem to like it, either!
I called a pork and apple dish at the beginning of the battle, and sure enough, Tarbell presented it to the judges. It was the only dish of the challenger’s that the judges didn’t like.
The judging panel was odd. Steingarten commonly comes off as being a bit moody when the other judges don’t agree with his pallet, or when he doesn’t like the food. This isn’t necessarily always bad, but it reminds me of a grumpy old man who has no regard for other people, which can justly be viewed as a judge, but doesn’t really help the viewer of the show. When someone else says “I don’t taste the apple in this dish”, and his only rebuttal is “I disagree - I DO taste the apple” it just doesn’t work for people who aren’t there, smelling and tasting the dish. Bone Crusher actually played a very nice contrast to Steingarten, even nudging him and tell him to cool it down (which everyone on the panel laughed about,) but the end result leaves us feeling as if we’re viewing a cackle of geese on screen fighting. This has happened many times in Iron Chef America, and it’s the only thing I don’t like about it. There’s obvious tension on the panel, but it’s not always justified.
Anyway, to critique the judging and not mention that the judges are supposed to convey to the audience exactly what the dishes are like wouldn’t provide positive criticism to them. To Bone Crusher: We obviously expect the dished on Iron Chef America to be excellent - we expect them to be good, but you didn’t tell us what was good about them. You either liked it, really liked it, or didn’t like it - but we didn’t know what you did or didn’t like about it. Steingarten mentioned that one of Tarbell’s dishes (the one with the scallop) was overcooked and the scallop was rubbery - you disagreed, but just said “I think it’s good.” -that may be the truth, but if you disagreed, which part did you disagree about? Was your scallop overcooked? Anyway, food for thought to help the viewers the next time you judge Iron Chef America ![]()
Categories : Food Network, Iron Chef America















